Home arrow Resources arrow AJC Articles arrow What the Sub-Prime Mortgage Meltdown Means to You and Me - 2007-09-08

Your Cart

Show Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.

Login

What the Sub-Prime Mortgage Meltdown Means to You and Me - 2007-09-08
I am not an economist. I earned a C in my sole economics course at Emory College, when I studied under Dr. William Shropshire. So I will not pretend to give you an economic explanation of the recent gyrations in the mortgage industry and their co-conspirators on Wall Street.

But I have been involved in the residential real estate business in Georgia for over thirty years now, and my tenure has given me some insight into market fluctuations.

And while the media would have you believe that recent changes in the sub-prime mortgage industry are leading inevitably to an economic disaster from which mankind may never recover, I would submit the following statements for your consideration:

1. The stock market goes up and the stock market goes down, and no one yet has been able to accurately explain why. The volatility of the stock market isn't new, and we shouldn't be surprised when it happens. This is a normal and natural part of the capital system, and certain stocks fall out of favor while others come into favor. This is not unusual, and it's OK.

In addition, my friends who study the stock market tell me that the market hates uncertainty, and that the lack of liquidity for the resale of non-conforming mortgage loans has created uncertainty.

Until that liquidity is restored, those who hold non-conforming loans as investments are having difficulty determining exactly what those investments are truly worth. And until that difficulty is resolved, fewer investors than in the past are willing to invest in these types of loans.

2. The interest rate you pay on the mortgage you seek is based on the risk of default that the lender must accept. That concept is called "risk-based pricing," and it is why lenders rely more and more on the applicant's numerical credit score rather than traditional debt to income ratios.

However, the lenders who approved the sub-prime loan applications knew that these borrowers were, for various reasons, not able to qualify for traditional loan products. That's why they were labeled "sub-prime."

Their very name was an obvious indication of the higher risk that the lender was being asked to accept, and if the lender failed to take this risk into account at the time the loan was priced, it is certainly no one's fault except the lender.

And if the lender packaged a number of these loan products together and sold them as a financial security on Wall Street, then it was the responsibility of the ultimate investor to discover the actual degree of risk being undertaken.

3. The loans in question are almost all totally secured by residential real estate with a fair market value equal to or in excess of the amount of each loan. And while it is possible that the value of some homes has declined over the past several years, it is a fact that home values nationwide have not yet shown any major decline.

Thus, we should remember that if the lender forecloses on the home and takes ownership of the property, it will eventually sell that property at some price, and that the proceeds of that sale will be used to offset the loss by the lender. The bottom line here is that it is almost impossible for any lender in first mortgage position to suffer a complete loss. It is much more likely that the ultimate investor will eventually recover between 70 and 80 percent of their investment.

4. The loans we are all so worried about represent an extremely small fraction of the overall portfolio of loans made on homes in America today. In fact, according to the most recent data from the Mortgage Bankers Association, the rate of loans entering the foreclosure process is far less than one percent, 0.58% in fact, and most of that is concentrated in seven states, not including Georgia.

According to Doug Duncan, MBA's Chief Economist, "The percentage of loans in foreclosure would be well below the average of the last ten years were it not for Ohio, Michigan and Indiana, and the rate of foreclosures started nationwide would have fallen were it not for the big jumps in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona. Those states have special circumstances that do not reflect what is happening in the rest of the country."

5. The overall economy is doing pretty darned well right now. Corporate profits are strong and unemployment is low, personal income is up and capitalism still works.
 
Some residential markets, particularly in the seven states listed above, saw prices rise at unsustainable rates during the early part of this decade. Those over-heated markets needed to take a break, and the riskiest loans made in those areas are experiencing the highest rates of delinquency and loss.

In contrast, home values in Georgia have increased slowly and steadily over the past decade, and now represent some of the best values available on a comparative nationwide basis. I expect that to continue.

6. For most Americans, owing their own home continues to be one of the best investments they ever made. I believe that won't change.

I do believe that lenders need to exercise greater control over their underwriting guidelines and their loan officers involvement in fraud, and I believe that's exactly what will happen.

Once lenders get their procedures for loan approval in line with prudent industry standards, investors will once again evaluate their loans for risk and invest as they deem appropriate. That's the way the market works.
 
< Prev   Next >

Upcoming Events

John Adams Presents


LANDLORD SURVIVAL TRAINING

with John Adams
Tuesday, February 28th

Being a landlord can be a rewarding experience. It can also be a difficult one if you don't have the knowledge and understanding of what the process requires.

Few schools offer degrees in property management, so most landlords learn "on-the-job" through acquired knowledge and on-the-job experience, essentially re-inventing the wheel. This is an expensive and depressing way to learn anything.

Whether you're a full-time landlord or just getting ready to purchase your first rental property, whether you are a licensed Georgia real estate professional or an accidental landlord, this seminar will help you improve your property's value, increase your cash flow and decrease your expenses, from attracting (and retaining) good tenants to maintaining your property to understanding your rights and obligations under the law.

For more details and to register click HERE

PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION WORKSHOP
with John Adams
Tuesday, March 27th

One of the significant annual expenses faced by any Georgia property owner is ad valorem property tax. Depending on where you live, it can be as high as three percent of the property's fair market value, and it must be paid year after year after year.

As a result, efforts to minimize this expense are not only worthwhile, they are encouraged by Georgia law. The phrase "ad valorem" means that each property is taxed based only on its value, and no one is required to pay a penny more than the minimum the law demands.

At the Property Tax Reduction Workshop, real estate expert John Adams will review the system he has used for over thirty years to reduce valuations and assessments in Georgia counties and municipalities, saving himself literally hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years.

In this 3 hour information packed seminar, John will teach you how to:

1. Understand the legal process of Property Tax Assessment
2. Meet the newly uniform Tax Deadlines
3. File your own Property Tax Return with a realistic valuation
4. Document your PT-50R with facts to support your case
5. Proactively meet with your Appraiser to reach an agreement
6. Protest your Notice of Assessment in an Intelligent manner
7. Give the Assessor an Opportunity to Save Face
8. Appeal to your Board of Equalization, in person or by mail
9. Make Your Case to the BOE
10. Take Your Case to Superior Court if necessary

If you are not doing all these steps now, you are likely costing yourself hundreds or thousands of dollars a year. If you own just one house, you could easily save over a thousand dollars over the next three years. If you own properties valued collectively over a million dollars, you are literally throwing away your profits year after year.

For more details and to register click HERE